We fail to see the point of this
In that same article, Pitrola accuses us of trying to conceal the truth from the fighters and of not applying workers’ demo
What we want to do is to develop at a level of the advance guard a discussion on class independence, workers’ demo
Why do they grant us so much space?
This is the question activists who have read
On the other hand, this attack has not started now, with the debate on the elections in the CTA. In April
Lately they have been applying the tactics of demand and denunciation (a tactics normally used only for the leaders of the bureau
And all this is part of a systematic attack against Morenism. The latest has been a defamatory accusation against Nahuel Moreno in relation to his policy towards the State of Israel, which we responded in number 127 of our Lucha Socialista.
This attack is no coincidence
We believe that what the
PO is attacking is a way of conducting policies, a conception. A conception that Morenism has always upheld, that of defending unity of struggle and a thorough exercise of workers’ demo cracy in order to advance in the struggle against the governments, the employers and the bureau cracy. This conception has led us to stand up against those who have pretended to impose the decisions of the political trends making them prevail over the demo cratic resolutions of mass organisms.
This was what made us confront the way the
PO acted in the Piquetero Block (of which we were founders) and in the ANT just as we challenged the way the MST acted in the Popular Assemblies.
These methods have a lot to do with an electoral logic that forces them to constantly stand apart and draw the attention of the media even in the foremost moments of the revolution, to place all the emphasis on the Constituent Assembly and not on the development of organisation of power.
It is a well-known fact that these methods could not be defeated and that they led to the sterilisation of the Popular Assemblies and the Piquetero Assemblies, the embryos of dual power of the 2002 revolution. They were turned into fenced-in manors of the MST and the
PO and engaged in the service of their electoral policies, something that became extremely useful for the regime to deviate the revolution into an electoral solution. Our Morenist conception has led us to challenge these methods in the trade union plenary meeting held on 2 April 2005 and to coincide with an ample fringe of fighters with whom we organised the Labour Day rally on the Lorea Square and the MIC.
All this is what caused the
PO attack. They are not harassing a small party. They are out against a policy and a conception that challenges them and goes out to meet of the feeling in ample sectors of activism who repudiate their methods. That is why the raid against the FOS is part of an attack against the new leaderships and everything they cannot lead and control.